I have a legacy DLL written in C that contains a function that returns a string, and I need to access this function from Delphi. The only info I have about the DLL is the VB declare for accessing the function:
Public Declare Function DecryptStr Lib "strlib" (Str As String) As String
I've tried the following without success:
Declaration:
function DecryptStr(s: PChar): PChar; cdecl; external 'strlib.dll';
Usage:
var
p1, p2 : pchar;
begin
GetMem( p1, 255 );
StrPCopy( p2, 'some string to decrypt' );
p1 := DecryptStr( p2 );
end;
This consistently crashes the DLL with an Access Violation. I'm at a loss.
Any suggestions ?
-
I'm guessing here, but are you sure it's cdecl? If the VB declare isn't mentioning it, I'd assume it's in fact a STDCALL function (STDCALL is quite common on Windows, as almost all of its native API uses it). Calling a function of one calling convention as if it were of another calling convention can really mess up the stack, usually leading to a crash.
Also, be sure to check whether the string is ANSI (LPSTR/LPCSTR) or UNICODE (LPWSTR/LPCWSTR). I don't know VB or Delphi, so I don't know what each one uses by default.
From CesarB -
Actually I've tried both, cdecl and stdcall; no difference.
From Kevin McBrearty -
I agree with CesarB, try to declare it with stdcall directive as:
function DecryptStr(s: PChar): PChar; stdcall; external 'strlib.dll';if it doesn't work, post the VB declaration here.
CesarB : He already posted the VB declaration, it's two paragraphs above the Delphi one.Mohammed Nasman : opps sorry, you are right CesarB, I didn't noticed it because he didn't mark it as code.From Mohammed Nasman -
p2 isn't initialized. StrPCopy copies the string to a random memory location. And most likely the calling convention is stdcall.
From Jozz -
Consider rewriting your test code as follows:
var p1, p2 : pchar; begin GetMem( p1, 255 ); // initialize GetMem( p2, 255 ); StrPLCopy( p2, 'some string to decrypt', 255 ); // prevent buffer overrun StrPLCopy( p1, DecryptStr( p2 ), 255); // make a copy since dll will free its internal buffer end;If still fails within a call to DecryptStr, then read http://support.microsoft.com/kb/187912 carefully.
From andrius -
The best way in these kind of situation is to debug your program and check the stack before and after executing the callback. How knows, it might even be a bug in the external DLL?
This way you will see pretty easy how to correct this.
From botismarius -
Was the dll written in Borland C or C++Builder by any chance with the intention of being used with Delphi? In which case it could have been compiled using a pascal directive.
From Cruachan -
As Jozz says, p2 (where you copy your string to) is never initialized in your example.
Try this instead.
var p1, p2 : pchar; begin GetMem( p2, 255 ); // allocate memory for 'some string...' StrPCopy( p2, 'some string to decrypt' ); p1 := DecryptStr( p2 ); end;Also, the memory you allocated by calling Getmem(p1,...) would have been leaked, because p1 was overwritten by the function return from DecryptStr.
However, I'd be a bit concerned about exactly what DecryptStr is returning, and who owns the memory pointed to by p1. If it's returning a pointer to memory allocated by the DLL you will need to be careful how that memory is freed.
From Roddy -
The suggestions that the strings must be "initialised" seem to be correct. This is because C will require that the string being passed in is null-terminated. Check that the character in the bufffer just after the end of the text is a null (#0).
Why do you assume that the string passed in is exactly 255 chars long? You need to allocate Length(p1) + 1 bytes - for the chars in p1, and a #0 char at the end.
Also, your code sample seems confused as to the use of p1 and p2. It looks like p1 is the buffer passed to the C DLL, which you allocate, and p2 is the returned string that the DLL allocates. But then the code would be (note use of p1 and p2)
var p1, p2 : pchar; begin GetMem( p1, 255 ); StrPCopy( p1, 'some string to decrypt' ); p2 := DecryptStr( p1 ); end;Better variable names would help you make this clearer.
From Anthony
0 comments:
Post a Comment