Our server is overloaded with TCP/IP sessions, we have 1200 - 1500 of them. Most of them are hanging in TIME_OUT state. It turns out that a connection in TIME_OUT state occupies a socket until 60 second time-out is elapsed.
The problem is that the server gets unresponsive and many clients are not getting served.
I have made a simple test: download an XML file from the server with Internet Explorer 8.0 The download finishes in a fraction of second. But then I see that the TCP/IP connection is hanging in TIME_OUT state for 60 seconds.
Is there any way to get rid of TIME_OUT waiting or make it less to free the socket for new connections?
I understand why TCP/IP connection enters TIME_OUT state, but I don't understand why Internet Explorer does not close the connection after the XML file download is over.
The details.
Our server runs web service written in Perl (mod-perl). The service provides weather data to clients. Client is a Flash appication (actually Flash ActiveX control embedded in Windows application).
OS: Ubuntu
Apache "Keep Alive" option is set to 0
-
This is a setting in your TCP stack. Since we don't know what platform you're on we can't say exactly what it's called and how to change it.
UPDATE
So you're using Ubuntu. You can use
sysctl
to reduce thenet.inet.tcp.msl
value to half the desiredTIME_WAIT
duration (in milliseconds -- seeman -S 4 tcp
), e.g.sysctl net.inet.tcp.msl=2500
. Beware of the implications of doing so with respect to wandering packets that may arrive after theTIME_WAIT
period elapses.par : Our server runs Ubuntu, I have updated the detailsFrom vladr -
I assume you mean
TIME_WAIT
. The peer that initiates the active close is the one that entersTIME_WAIT
(see state transition diagram here) so if you can have your client close the connection then you'll move theTIME_WAIT
off to the client. See this answer for more details and a link to a good article aboutTIME_WAIT
problems and how to solve them.Another alternative, if you cant have the client issue the active close, is to reset the connection by setting linger to false before closing it. This causes an
RST
to be sent rather thanFIN
.par : Oh, thank you very much! But how can I control TCP/IP connection when the user loads an XML file with Internet Explorer?Len Holgate : `TIME_WAIT` is normal and unless your server performance is suffering because of it it's not something I'd worry too much about. When the socket is in `TIME_WAIT` it takes up some resources but it doesn't mean that the connection is still open or that the server is still processing it.par : Thank you thank you thank you very much!From Len Holgate
0 comments:
Post a Comment